|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Goldnut Sachs
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 10:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I find it very telling about the mindsets of people playing this game when the question "Should Null sec Industry be as good as high sec" is asked It really speaks of deep problems in the game that the question even needs to be asked, and even then the fact that it was not just a "How much better than Hi-sec should it be?" It does speak of a cancer in this game where people are punished for risk, punished for capital investment and lets face it just punished because they do not want to sit in Hi-sec making no better money than anyone else with the base skills. Now EvE is far from dying but the biggest question is, is it changing into something that will kill us all of boredom? Even mining in Hi-sec can get boring after time and missions are boring from the time you press accept. EvE has always been about people striking out into space whether that be Sov space, NPC, lo-sec,Worm holes and so very much more. But now things are changing and it has gotten to the point that people even have to ask the question of whether risk=reward or whether reward should be directly opposite the risks taken. It is a very sad state of affairs And don't get me started on the CSM voting system (well more like a torture system) oops to late I already started. tl;dr don't nerf high sec or see eve die?
|
Goldnut Sachs
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 10:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
oops, but he did support Issler
Issler |
Goldnut Sachs
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 10:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
looking forward to your campaign this year for issler |
Goldnut Sachs
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 11:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
I voted for the emperor of space, my dear supreme leader, and learned that a grown man can be bullied in a computer game. |
Goldnut Sachs
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 14:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Fearghaz Tiwas wrote:Actually, you have. What I suggested would help all areas outside of trade hubs. Probably most benefiting Hi sec, followed by low. Admittedly, it might not help NPC null as much as Sov, but it would help. Highsec should pay for protection in the form of taxes on the buying and selling of items, at higher rates depending on the sec status.
If there's to be a revolution of how EvE works it has to be well planned and all encompassing (the current model is all encompassing). As such if we really have to dumb down EvE enough to provide a predictable and canned reward = f(risk), then a priority has to be done about where risk is the highest and give the top buff in there. Regardless whether hi sec has to be nerfed or not, in the end the reward = f(risk) profile should be: hi sec (lowest) => sov sec => low sec => WH => NPC null sec, with some more thought about where to exactly place WHs in that scale. Guess what, the huge majority of these photocopy nerf threads revolve the second least risk area inhabitants only thinking about themselves as some sort of "better than others", forget (or even screw) everybody else. i am sorry Frying Doom, this here is the tl;dr don't nerf highsec or see eve die. |
Goldnut Sachs
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 15:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha I am not unfamiliar with your posting. You are simply against a nerf in highsec, and you often defend your opinions with some vaporous concepts like a big revolutionary change in mechanic, requiring ring mining, mining and sov changes and etc to take place before a hair can be touched on high sec, ending with you stating that you are too rich to care either way, cus you are a super kewl Boiler Room securities trader.
And let's not forget you suport eve going ftp + mircrotransactions. |
Goldnut Sachs
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 04:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:inb4 someone completely misses the point of analogy. inb4 nullbear 100% safety in the big blue donut, we're so cool in the WHs. |
Goldnut Sachs
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 09:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
what part of statistical balance do you not understand, Malcanis |
Goldnut Sachs
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 09:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Goldnut Sachs wrote:what part of statistical balance do you not understand, Malcanis Well I guess the part where it's all perfectly fine and dandy for sov 0.0 to have 3% of the production capacity of hi-sec, but an EVE-killing catastrophe if sov 0.0 has more production capacity than hi-sec. It's perfectly fine and dandy considering because it is vital that all the gimmick 3 alt corps of highsec cannot bear to have a hair nerfed from the teet of low cost casual-newbie-friendly highsec npc stations, or eve will die, it's literally our fault that we try to blow up all neutrals in sov space. |
Goldnut Sachs
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 11:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
wow again with the "i am too rich and too leet-industrialist to care either way, but think of the newbies". the proposed nerfs will be no worse than mission loot drops, and the null anomaly nerf and drone poo in null, incursion nerf, and so on.
both sides just need to stop using the newbie card. |
|
Goldnut Sachs
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 13:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
http://themittani.com/features/sov-problems-why-no-new-blood while not exactly newbies, it is also important for fledgling alliances to have enough incentive to carve out a foothold in nullsec. while most constellation may lack tech moons, the proposed improvements to industry may be the ticket, as an accessible source of income for line members who actually use the space actively as intended. |
Goldnut Sachs
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 16:02:00 -
[12] - Quote
goons goons goons goons goons goons |
Goldnut Sachs
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 05:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Mayhaw Morgan wrote:Now, let me ask this: Why don't you "pvpers" secure your own damn space and make a place for your ducks to swim around in your own pond, rather than have to fly all the way to high sec in order to keep you supplied with ships, ammo, modules, rigs, etc.? I'm having a hard time putting into words just how stupid your post is. It's seriously mind-blowingly stupid, and you MAY have been excused for it if we hadn't said many MANY times in this very same thread how it's actually NOT POSSIBLE TO DO. But you either willfully or out of sheer ignorance completely miss the point every time. You fell hard for a full-tard troll, shame on you. |
Goldnut Sachs
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 07:15:00 -
[14] - Quote
correct it is a cultural thang https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=208832&find=unread "I don't know these people" |
Goldnut Sachs
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 09:50:00 -
[15] - Quote
hur hur hur we do not sow |
|
|
|